首页> 外文OA文献 >Geographical indications and quality promotion in food and agricultural markets: domestic and international issues
【2h】

Geographical indications and quality promotion in food and agricultural markets: domestic and international issues

机译:粮食和农业市场中的地理标志和质量提升:国内和国际问题

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This dissertation addresses three questions concerning the economics of geographical indications (GIs) and the role of intellectual property (IP) protection in the provision of quality in food and agricultural markets. The first essay compares and contrasts different instruments (i.e., alternative certification schemes and trademarks) used to provide IP protection for GIs. From a policy perspective, this essay offers recommendations with regard to the most desirable type of IP protection instrument for GIs. The model indicates that a sui generis scheme based on appellations is preferable to standard instruments, such as certification marks, that are currently used in many important markets including the United States, because appellations improve the collective reputation of certified products and reduce the total cost (i.e., the sum of production and information costs) of providing quality compared to standard instruments.The second essay investigates whether consumers recognize and value the informational content of a variety of nested geographical origin labels from foreign countries. This study disentangles three types of geographical origin labels with different levels of geographical differentiation: country-of-origin labels and two types of GIs, protected designations of origin (PDO) and protected geographical indications (PGI). Consumer data show that, within the context of a high-quality value-added commodity such as extra virgin olive oil, consumers\u27 willingness to pay for oils from different countries varies, ceteris paribus, across countries, and that within a country consumers have a greater willingness to pay for GI-labeled than non-GI-labeled products. We also find evidence that consumers value PDOs more than PGIs.The third essay investigates the incentives of GI-exporting and GI-importing countries to strengthen the current TRIPS provisions for GIs. This essay explicitly considers the role of promotion in expanding market demand when consumers lack information regarding either the existence or the features of the GI and GI-like products. The model highlights the diverging interests of GI-exporting and GI-importing countries with regard to GI provisions in international markets and provides a key to interpret the current controversy over GIs among WTO members.
机译:本文解决了三个有关地理标志经济学和知识产权保护在粮食和农业市场质量提供中的作用的问题。第一篇文章比较并对比了用于为地理标志提供IP保护的不同工具(即替代认证方案和商标)。从政策的角度来看,本文针对地理标志最理想的知识产权保护工具类型提供了建议。该模型表明,基于名称的特殊方案优于诸如美国等许多重要市场目前使用的标准商标(例如认证商标),因为名称可以提高认证产品的集体声誉并降低总成本(第二篇文章调查了消费者是否认识到并重视来自国外的各种嵌套地理标记的信息内容。这项研究将三种具有不同地理区分级别的地理原产标签进行了区分:原产国标签和两种地理标志,受保护的原产地名称(PDO)和受保护的地理标志(PGI)。消费者数据显示,在诸如特级初榨橄榄油之类的优质增值商品的背景下,消费者在不同国家,不同国家和地区购买油的意愿各不相同,在一个国家内,消费者拥有与非地理标志产品相比,消费者更愿意为地理标志产品付费。我们还发现有证据表明,消费者对PDO的重视程度高于PGI。第三篇文章调查了地理标志出口国和地理标志进口国为加强现行的TRIPS地理标志规定而采取的激励措施。当消费者缺乏有关地理标志和类似地理标志产品的存在或特征的信息时,本文明确考虑了促销在扩大市场需求中的作用。该模型突出了地理标志出口国和地理标志进口国在国际市场上地理标志规定方面的利益分歧,并为解释当前在WTO成员之间关于地理标志的争议提供了关键。

著录项

  • 作者

    Menapace, Luisa;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号